Latín América : The Day After Is this Time Different? / Guillermo Perry, Alejandro Forero
By: Perry, Guillermo [autor]
Contributor(s): Forero, Alejandro [autor]
Series: Documentos CEDEPublisher: Bogotá : Universidad de los Andes, 2014Description: 38 páginas : ilustraciones, tablas ; 28 cmContent type: Media type: Carrier type: ISSN: 1657-5334Subject(s): Crecimiento


Item type | Current location | Collection | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
B. Campus los Cerros Colección general | Colección general | 338.5 P462 (Browse shelf) | Año 2015 | 1 | Available | 0000048784 |
Browsing B. Campus los Cerros Shelves , Shelving location: Colección general , Collection code: Colección general Close shelf browser
No cover image available | ||||||||
338.5 N52 Microeconomía intermedia y su aplicación / | 338.5 N52 Microeconomía intermedia y su aplicación / | 338.5 N52 Microeconomía intermedia y su aplicación / | 338.5 P462 Latín América : The Day After Is this Time Different? / | 338.5 P652 Microeconomía / | 338.5 V426 Análisis microeconómico / | 338.5 V426 Análisis microeconómico / |
Incluye referencias bibliográficas
Latin America had a golden decade from 2002 to 2012, mostly thanks to favorable external conditions. Its commodity exports prices raised almost continuously, there were abundant capital inflows and low international interest rates. This golden decade has come to an end, even while no sudden worsening of external conditions is expected. Using several short term and structural indicators, this paper analyzes if this decade represented a turning point. Macroeconomic and financial vulnerabilities were indeed sharply reduced, labor market conditions improved significantly and investment rates increased, in most countries. Many of these achievements are likely to stay and Latin America may prove to be much more resilient to future shocks than in the past. However, the boom in extractive exports prices led to over-concentration of exports, stagnation of other tradable activities and other symptoms of Dutch Disease. Worst still, productivity gaps were not reduced as their structural determinants improved just too slowly. In summary, the boom was not completely wasted, nor was it fully capitalized.
There are no comments for this item.